Your browser (Internet Explorer 7 or lower) is out of date. It has known security flaws and may not display all features of this and other websites. Learn how to update your browser.

X

Navigate / search

How To: Shoot Sports Photography

This week’s “How To” is about sports and action photography, which has a whole list of other issues compared to shooting live music (last issue of “How To”). Once again, the type of lens you use is of the utmost importance, more so than for live music or basic portrait photography. Your DSLR plays a major role as well, but this time more because of rapid fire than sensor size.

Every sports photographer has a telephoto lens, whether your sport-of-choice is football or motocross. It’s the same way that every samurai has a sword, every hunter a rifle. Most serious sports photographers have at least two, usually one that goes to 300mm, like Nikon’s 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 VR,  and one that goes much further like Sigma’s 150-500mm or a fixed 400mm f/2.8 (which runs upwards of $10, 000 – YIKES!!!!). Now don’t let those numbers scare you; keep in mind that sports photography is about reach. It’s about being away from the action so you don’t get smacked while capturing that touchdown or that upper cut. You don’t have to spend $1,000 on a telephoto lens, either. A good one starts at $400-450 brand new. It’s the ones designed for low light (like Canon’s 70-200mm f/2.8) or the mega zoom lenses (like Nikon’s 200-400mm VR) that cost you so much. A Sports photographer shouldn’t have to spend as much on his lenses as a wedding photographer, because glass quality is not the ultimate goal… unless you’re a lens snob –  in which case I must commend you. Sure, some telephoto lenses are sharper, but sports photography isn’t always about sharp. It’s about reach and passion and motion…and you can’t always get sharp with motion. It just doesn’t work that way – that’s more for wedding photographers.

Now, as for burst-mode photography, every DSLR has rapid fire capability (shooting multiple frames in a row in a significantly small amount of time), but some are better than others. If you’re a weekend warrior and you only shoot your son’s Tee-Ball team, then any DSLR will be able to keep up with your lil’ champion. However, once you move up to varsity sports in high school or college sports (or even pros!) it’s time to invest in a better camera. You don’t have to go out and buy a $3000 full-frame sensor DSLR – in fact, I don’t recommend full-frame sensor cameras for sports enthusiasts period – BUT if you spend a little more on your camera than you would  a Canon Rebel or a Nikon D3200, you can find a significant jump in your camera’s rapid fire. Beginner DSLRs typically start with rapid fire modes that cover 3 to 4 frames per second…which is not bad – that’s just fine for chasing the kids around the yard or watching your toddler’s soccer game. But once you spend up to $900 or more on a DSLR, the rapid fire goes up to 6 frames per second, or sometimes even 8, 9 or 11 frames per second! With that kind of speed, you can go out and shoot the Olympic games and get professional results.

The other function you want to take advantage of is your auto-focus motor. This tells the camera whether you’re shooting someone/thing that’s sitting still or moving fast  and it changes how your camera auto-focuses. For sports and action, you want to set your DSLR’s auto-focus to “AF-C” (in Nikon, Sony, Olympus, Pentax cameras) or “AI-Servo”  (for Canon cameras). This function will continue to re-focus on your athlete as he/she moves through the frame, and you’ll get sharper pictures. Now every DSLR has this function, but if you can spend $900 or more on your DSLR it will auto-focus faster and smoother. That’s very important if your shooting Formula One racing, or boxing, or UFC, or the NFL. The faster your athlete or sport of choice, the faster you need your camera to be.  Still not sure which camera or lens best suits you? Give us a call. Our sales staff have decades of photo experience and will happily point you in the right direction, or just email me at jharrison@precision-camera.com. In the meantime, Happy Hunting.

How To: Shoot Live Music Better Than the Next Guy – Pt.II

This next portion of  ”How To: Shoot Live Music Better Than the Next Guy” is for the photographer who is a little ahead of the curve when it comes to equipment and manual know-how. Today I’m going to discuss full-frame sensor DSLRs vs. cropped-sensor DSLRs and the pros and cons of each – because, believe it or not, but both types have serious advantages.

 There are a wide range of cropped-sensor cameras, but only a handful of full-frame sensor cameras. A full-frame sensor is a digital sensor that’s the same size as the film plane on a 35mm negative, where a cropped-sensor is smaller than 35mm. What does that mean exactly? Well, with a full-frame sensor camera, all the lenses from my film camera look exactly the way they did when I shot film; on a cropped-sensor camera however, the focal length effectively changes, because the surface area of the sensor is smaller than what the lens is used to fitting over.

In other words, any lens I used on my film camera is going to give me more zoom on my cropped-sensor DSLRThis is a cropped-sensor digital camera’s biggest advantage. The down side is my film camera wide-angle lenses won’t be wide-angle anymore; they’ll be closer to mid-range focal lengths. That’s terrible for wide-angle photography like landscapes and architecture, but great news for any tele-photo lens I put on my DSLR, as a telephoto lens will now give me more zoom!  If you have a cropped-sensor DSLR like I do, how do you figure out what the new focal length will be on  your digital camera when using older lenses? Well, that depends on who makes the camera. It breaks down like this: if you shoot a Nikon, Sony or Pentax cropped-sensor DSLR, multiply your older lens’ focal length by 1.5 x. If you shoot Canon, multiply your older lenses by 1.6x. If you’re shooting a Micro Four-Thirds camera, then multiply it by 2x. So, my old film-camera wide-angle 28-90mm lens will be closer to a 36-105mm lens on my Nikon D7000. The advantage really shows when I put my old 75-300mm telephoto lens on there….it becomes a whopping 95mm-450mm zoom lens!  This is why many sports and wildlife photographers still shoot cropped-sensor DSLRs – so they can get better reach from their lenses.

Now, the advantages of a full-frame sensor DSLR will be more noticeable in low-light photography, such as live music and  evening weddings. A full-frame sensor has significantly larger pixels, which provides cleaner images when shooting at higher ISO settings (a  MUST for low-light photography)! Full-frame sensors work this way because the individual pixels are larger and therefore gather more information (color, light, detail) than a cropped-sensor. Keep in mind, 1 megapixel = 1 million pixels. If you have a full-frame sensor camera, you have A LOT of big pixels. That is also why full-frame sensor cameras have less noise at 3200 ISO than a cropped-sensor camera at the same ISO setting.

So, when shopping for your next DSLR and you’re stuck between which one to buy, full-frame sensor or cropped-sensor camera….ask yourself which is more important: better zoom or cleaner images in the dark? That’s the main deciding factor, especially when it comes to live music. Either way you go, you’re getting amazing quality. Still not sure which is better for you? Call and ask our sales staff. If you tell them what you want to shoot, they’ll tell you which to go with. In the meantime, Happy Hunting!

Macro Monday

Good Monday Morning to you. I hope you got to shoot as much as I did this weekend…..consequently, I hope your images turned out better than mine. Not every shoot goes according to plan, and not every image is a keeper. As Ansel Adams said: “Twelve significant photographs in any one year is a good crop.” And sometimes that’s all we get.

Did you happen to guess what last week’s Macro Monday submission was? It was salted almonds. In all truth, they were BBQ/Habanero almonds, but “salted almonds” or just “almonds” would have worked. Now, this week’s submission is trickier than last. So, can you tell me what you’re looking at?

Macro Monday

Top of the morning, to you all. Welcome back to another edition of Macro Monday. Did you catch what last week’s submission was?  ….it was tea bags.  Two of them to be exact. I had to keep the brand name out of frame, otherwise it would have been far too easy. Shall we proceed to the next submission? Take a long hard look and tell me what you’re looking at. And please, be as specific as possible.

Macro Monday

Welcome back to the hum-and-drum of the work week. I trust your weekend was as fruitful as mine, as I set out with my camera on both Saturday and Sunday to get some shooting done. Only a couple of keepers, but that’s how it goes: not every image can be a winner. Speaking of winners, last week’s submission was……a saw-tooth hanger on a picture frame. Did you get it? Was it too hard? Saw-tooth hanger would have won, or just hanger. Try to keep your minds open as I’m working to include everyday items so as to expand your horizons and encourage you to take a second look at the world around you. As for this week’s submission – can you tell me what you’re looking at?